DINASTIRESDINASTIRES

Journal of Law, Politic and HumanitiesJournal of Law, Politic and Humanities

Indonesia continues to face rice scarcity and rising prices due to policy inefficiencies, despite government efforts to ensure availability and affordability. This article evaluates the authority of Ministries and Institutions in making policies to mitigate rice scarcity, using normative legal research methods supported by economic analysis. The study reveals a lack of institutional coordination, resulting in reduced purchasing power. The findings highlight the need for improved policy-making mechanisms to address this critical issue.

Based on the preceding analysis, this study arrives at the following key conclusions.The current allocation of legal authority and jurisdiction among Ministries and Institutions in implementing rice procurement policies remains suboptimal in mitigating rice shortages in society.This condition is attributable to inadequate coordination, compounded by limited understanding and the insufficient quality of policy formulation.The prevailing rice shortage has already affected the public, particularly low-income groups, thereby posing the risk of continuing the diminishing of household purchasing power.In light of these findings, the Government should refine the policy-making mechanism by formulating a master guideline for policy impact analysis to support the implementation of the PPP Law.Furthermore, it should issue a new Presidential Instruction in lieu of Presidential Instruction No.7 of 2017 to require all Ministries and State Institutions to conduct policy impact analysis in decision-making.

Berdasarkan analisis, penelitian lanjutan dapat difokuskan pada beberapa area penting. Pertama, perlu dilakukan studi mendalam mengenai efektivitas koordinasi antar kementerian dan lembaga terkait dalam implementasi kebijakan pangan, dengan fokus pada identifikasi hambatan dan solusi konkret untuk meningkatkan sinergi. Kedua, penelitian kuantitatif dapat dilakukan untuk mengukur dampak kebijakan Harga Eceran Tertinggi (HET) terhadap perilaku konsumen dan produsen beras, serta menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keberhasilan atau kegagalan kebijakan tersebut. Ketiga, penelitian kualitatif dapat mengeksplorasi persepsi dan pengalaman masyarakat, khususnya kelompok rentan, terhadap kebijakan pangan yang ada, serta mengidentifikasi kebutuhan dan harapan mereka terkait dengan ketersediaan dan keterjangkauan beras. Dengan menggabungkan hasil dari ketiga penelitian ini, diharapkan dapat diperoleh pemahaman yang komprehensif mengenai tantangan dan peluang dalam pengelolaan kebijakan pangan di Indonesia, sehingga dapat dirumuskan rekomendasi kebijakan yang lebih efektif dan berkeadilan.

  1. Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities | Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities.... doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i1Vol 6 No 1 2025 JLPH Journal of Law Politic and Humanities Journal of Law Politic and Humanities doi 10 38035 jlph v6i1
Read online
File size490.56 KB
Pages11
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test