JAYABAYAJAYABAYA

The Southeast Asia Law JournalThe Southeast Asia Law Journal

Article features corporation as activities-oriented for profit can lead to potential violations of law or corporate crime. Corporate crime of law politics, legal standing, subject crime of law. The criminal action corporations can arise because the impact of corporate activities arising from business contracts, product quality problems, failure of information technology systems and negligence of the administrative requirements for business licensing compliance. In other words, the legal entity of crime was often referred as corporate crime as violations committed by businesses to profit more quickly and maintains the companys reputation. The study concluded, first, the political dimension of the criminal law on corporation has general nature, that political criminal law founded in Criminal Code Bill which are oriented to the development of law by placing the corporation as a criminal, and need a codification law of Corporation. Second, The political criminal law also has special nature, which is found in 16 laws examined, in the contexts of criminal responsibility concepts and application of pattern of criminal as well as models of criminal sanctions can be imposed on perpetrators of criminal acts of the corporation.

The political dimension of criminal law on the legal standing of a corporate legal entity as a legal subject in a criminal offense may be general and special.The general character relates to generalist legal matter, while the special political dimension of corporate criminal law has accommodated the concept of criminal liability, the model of punishment, and the system of sanctions for corporations.In practice, law enforcement processes involving corporations have not proceeded as they should, facing challenges related to civil, administrative, and criminal law.Therefore, a clear separation between these aspects of the law is necessary to improve the effectiveness of corporate criminal law enforcement.

Berdasarkan analisis terhadap latar belakang, metode, hasil, dan keterbatasan penelitian ini, terdapat beberapa saran penelitian lanjutan yang dapat dipertimbangkan. Pertama, perlu dilakukan penelitian mendalam mengenai efektivitas implementasi prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG) dalam mencegah tindak pidana korporasi, dengan fokus pada mekanisme pengawasan internal dan eksternal yang dapat memperkuat akuntabilitas perusahaan. Kedua, penelitian lebih lanjut dapat dilakukan untuk mengkaji model pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi yang lebih efektif, termasuk mempertimbangkan penerapan sanksi administratif dan perdata sebagai pelengkap sanksi pidana. Ketiga, penelitian perlu dilakukan untuk mengeksplorasi peran teknologi, seperti penggunaan artificial intelligence dan big data analytics, dalam mendeteksi dan mencegah tindak pidana korporasi, serta meningkatkan efisiensi proses investigasi dan penegakan hukum. Penelitian-penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi signifikan dalam pengembangan kerangka hukum dan kebijakan yang lebih komprehensif dan efektif dalam memerangi tindak pidana korporasi di Indonesia.

Read online
File size215.71 KB
Pages15
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test