UKIMUKIM

ARUMBAE: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi dan Studi AgamaARUMBAE: Jurnal Ilmiah Teologi dan Studi Agama

Living together in diversity in Indonesia is still a problem that is sometimes unnoticed and can trigger riots regardless of race, class or religion. The same thing is also found in Deuteronomy 25:17-19 which shows the relationship between Amalek and Israel as a nation full of war, so that if not interpreted critically it can cause a destructive attitude towards every people who live side by side with the other. This article aims to interpret using ideological criticism. The ideological criticism attempts to find the authors meaning and the readers ideology which are included in the interpretation system. The law of Deuteronomy 25:17-19 is an ideology of resistance to the other, so that there is a dominant mode that makes Amalek a representation of the indigenous people who are specifically described by D sources as having power in terms of religion, economy and politics. Therefore, the ideology of liberation as a counter ideology to free people from the power of the elite. The ideology of GODs universal love for all nations is a counter ideology to YHWHs theology of liberation which does not limit itself to every nation. This understanding gives birth to an awareness of people who live in diversity not to act militantly and aggressively to achieve the interests of individuals or certain communities. Rather, it is important to have an awareness of life that can create an attitude of mutual acceptance toward the other and living in an attitude of tolerance.

Based on the interpretation, the command to “remove the memory of Amalek is a part of requirement for the Israelites to live in holiness.The word “remembers (zkr) in Deuteronomy 25.17,19 relates to the cultic naming of sinful acts committed, hence religious syncretism.Ultimately, the author argues that Gods love extends to all nations, not just Israel, and emphasizes the importance of embracing diversity and mutual respect.

Further research could explore the practical implications of applying the concept of remembering and forgetting in contemporary interfaith dialogue and conflict resolution, particularly in contexts similar to post-conflict Maluku. Another avenue for investigation is a comparative study of how different theological interpretations of Deuteronomy 25:17-19 have historically influenced attitudes towards minority groups and the other in various cultural settings. Finally, a study examining the role of collective memory and historical narratives in shaping national identity and fostering either inclusivity or exclusivity could provide valuable insights for promoting peaceful coexistence and social justice. These studies should consider the historical context of the text and its potential for both liberation and oppression, aiming to develop a more nuanced understanding of its relevance in todays diverse world. By delving deeper into these areas, we can contribute to a more informed and compassionate approach to navigating the complexities of religious and cultural differences.

  1. Living with the Liyan: Ideological Interpretation of Deuteronomy 25:17-19 from the Perspective of the... doi.org/10.37429/arumbae.v7i1.1513Living with the Liyan Ideological Interpretation of Deuteronomy 25 17 19 from the Perspective of the doi 10 37429 arumbae v7i1 1513
Read online
File size381.92 KB
Pages13
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test