Publisher

UMSUMS

Journal QiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer StudiesQiST: Journal of Quran and Tafseer Studies Abstract

Quranic interpretation has undergone diverse methodological developments throughout Islamic intellectual history, one of which is tafsīr bi al-rayi or interpretation based on reason and ijtihād. However, this approach has long been debated among scholars, particularly concerning its potential status as a form of dakhil fi al-tafsir. In this context, two prominent scholars, Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Āshūr, represent two contrasting epistemological orientations. Ibn Taymiyyah viewed tafsir bi al-rayi critically, considering it a deviation when not grounded in authentic narrations from the Prophet, the Companions, and the Tābiīn. Conversely, Ibn Āshūr, as a modernist exegete, legitimized the use of reason in interpreting the Quran, provided it remained consistent with sharī principles and linguistic conventions. This study aims to analyze the epistemological foundations and interpretive methodologies of both scholars, highlighting how their differing intellectual contexts shaped their approaches to tafsīr bi al-rayi. The research gap lies in the limited comparative studies that systematically explore this epistemological tension between textual traditionalism and contextual rationalism. Using a qualitative approach and library research, this study examines primary sources of tafsīr and uṣūl al-tafsīr written by both figures. This study contributes to the broader discourse of Quranic hermeneutics by offering a nuanced understanding of how classical and modern paradigms interact in defining the boundaries of rational interpretation, thereby enriching contemporary discussions on methodological renewal in Quranic studies.

Conclusion

The study highlights the differing epistemological frameworks of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Āshūr regarding tafsīr bi al-rayi.Ibn Taymiyyah prioritized authentic transmitted reports, cautioning against interpretations solely based on reason, while Ibn Āshūr advocated for a constructive role of reason within Islamic legal and linguistic boundaries.This debate reflects the historical tension between safeguarding textual fidelity and responding to contemporary challenges.Ultimately, the validity of tafsīr bi al-rayi depends on the methodological framework and epistemological orientation of the interpreter.

Future Research

Future research should explore the practical application of Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Āshūrs approaches in contemporary Quranic interpretation. Further investigation is needed to analyze how their methodologies address modern ethical and social issues, such as human rights, gender equality, and environmental sustainability, while remaining grounded in Islamic principles. Additionally, a comparative study examining the reception and influence of their ideas in different Islamic intellectual traditions could reveal the broader impact of their contributions. Building upon the existing scholarship, research could also focus on developing a nuanced framework for evaluating the legitimacy of ijtihad-based exegesis, incorporating both textual fidelity and contextual relevance. Finally, exploring the potential for integrating classical and modern approaches to tafsir could offer a more comprehensive and dynamic understanding of the Quran for contemporary Muslims.

References

1. Tafsir bil Ra'yi as Intrusion: The Debate between Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn 'Ashur | QiST: Journal... doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i3.12904Tafsir bil Rayi as Intrusion The Debate between Ibn Taymiyyah and Ibn Ashur QiST Journal doi 10 23917 qist v4i3 12904

Metadata

File size	425.42 KB
Pages	20
DMCA	Report