UHBUHB

Jurnal Hukum In ConcretoJurnal Hukum In Concreto

The Courts judgment is necessary to examine, resolve, and decide cases. However, court errors can occur. This study aims to determine and analyze the law regarding judges incorrect legal considerations in the Ratio Decidendi theory and the juridical implications of misapplied law in decision Number 2802/Pdt.G/2019/Pa.Pwt. The research employs a normative juridical method, conceptualizing law as written legislation. Data sources are secondary, collected through literature review, including books, journals, and primary legal materials. Data collection involves identifying and clarifying legal facts through expert consultation. The study finds that incorrect legal considerations in the Ratio Decidendi theory, which are reasons determining the decision formulated in the verdict, do not affect the ruling but are binding on the parties unless appealed or cancelled.

The study concludes that the judges decision in case number 2802/Pdt.Pwt exhibited incorrect legal considerations, deviating from the core issues of the lawsuit.Despite this error, the decision remains legally binding as the ruling aligns with the verdict.Furthermore, the juridical implications of such errors are limited, as they do not automatically invalidate the decision unless challenged through legal appeals.Therefore, while maintaining judicial accuracy is crucial, the decisions enforceability is not inherently compromised by flawed reasoning.

Penelitian lebih lanjut perlu dilakukan untuk mengeksplorasi dampak psikologis dan sosiologis dari putusan pengadilan yang mengandung kesalahan pertimbangan hukum terhadap kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem peradilan. Hal ini dapat dilakukan melalui studi kualitatif mendalam dengan mewawancarai masyarakat, praktisi hukum, dan bahkan hakim itu sendiri untuk memahami persepsi mereka. Selain itu, penelitian perlu difokuskan pada pengembangan mekanisme internal di pengadilan untuk meningkatkan kualitas penyusunan putusan, seperti pelatihan berkelanjutan bagi hakim dan penggunaan teknologi untuk memeriksa konsistensi dan akurasi pertimbangan hukum. Terakhir, studi komparatif dengan sistem peradilan di negara lain yang memiliki mekanisme koreksi putusan yang lebih kuat dapat memberikan wawasan berharga tentang cara meningkatkan akuntabilitas dan transparansi dalam proses pengambilan keputusan hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian-penelitian ini diharapkan dapat berkontribusi pada peningkatan kualitas putusan pengadilan dan memperkuat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap sistem peradilan.

  1. Judges' Ratio Decidendi in Marriage Dispensation Cases at The Gresik Religious Court Regarding Marriage... journal.uwks.ac.id/norma/article/view/1089Judges Ratio Decidendi in Marriage Dispensation Cases at The Gresik Religious Court Regarding Marriage journal uwks ac norma article view 1089
  2. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. role religious court prevention underage marriage jurnal peradilan article... doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.116-131Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan role religious court prevention underage marriage jurnal peradilan article doi 10 25216 jhp 9 1 2020 116 131
  3. Judges' Legal Considerations (Ratio Decidendi) and Jurisdical Implications on the Criminal Acts... doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i12.3186Judges Legal Considerations Ratio Decidendi and Jurisdical Implications on the Criminal Acts doi 10 18415 ijmmu v8i12 3186
Read online
File size337.82 KB
Pages15
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test