SEAN INSTITUTESEAN INSTITUTE

MAR-Ekonomi: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Rumpun Ilmu EkonomiMAR-Ekonomi: Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Rumpun Ilmu Ekonomi

The purpose of this study was to determine whether KAP reputation, ethics, integrity, and auditor experience affect audit quality at public accounting firms in the Jakarta area. The population in this study were auditors who worked at public accounting firms in the Jakarta area. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling method. The sample used in this study were auditors who worked at 8 public accounting firms in the Jakarta area with a total of 46 respondents. The data used in this study are primary data obtained from questionnaires distributed directly and sent via gform by researchers to auditors in KAP who have been sampled for research. The analysis method of this research uses the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 25. This hypothesis was tested using descriptive statistical analysis, classical assumption test, multiple linear regression analysis test, and hypothesis testing. The results of this study indicate that (1) KAP reputation has a positive effect on audit quality (2) ethics has no effect on audit quality (3) integrity has no effect on audit quality (4) auditor experience has a positive effect on audit quality.

Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that KAP Reputation has a positive effect on Audit Quality, Ethics have no effect on Audit Quality, Integrity has no effect on Audit Quality, and Auditor Experience has a positive effect on Audit Quality.Furthermore, KAP Reputation, Ethics, Integrity, and Auditor Experience simultaneously have a positive effect on Audit Quality.These findings highlight the importance of KAP reputation and auditor experience in ensuring high-quality audits.

Penelitian selanjutnya dapat memperdalam pemahaman mengenai faktor-faktor lain yang mungkin memengaruhi kualitas audit, seperti budaya organisasi di KAP atau kompleksitas klien yang diaudit. Selain itu, studi kualitatif dapat dilakukan untuk menggali lebih dalam persepsi auditor mengenai pengaruh reputasi KAP terhadap pengambilan keputusan audit mereka, serta bagaimana mereka mengatasi dilema etika dalam praktik audit sehari-hari. Terakhir, penelitian dapat difokuskan pada pengembangan model prediktif kualitas audit yang lebih komprehensif, dengan mempertimbangkan interaksi antara berbagai variabel seperti kompetensi auditor, independensi, dan penggunaan teknologi dalam proses audit, sehingga dapat memberikan rekomendasi yang lebih akurat bagi KAP dan regulator dalam meningkatkan kualitas audit secara berkelanjutan.

  1. One moment, please.... moment please wait request verified ojs.stie-tdn.ac.id/index.php/TB/article/view/303One moment please moment please wait request verified ojs stie tdn ac index php TB article view 303
  2. One moment, please.... moment please wait request verified doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i4.1142One moment please moment please wait request verified doi 10 33395 owner v6i4 1142
  3. APA PsycNet. psycnet loading doi.org/10.1037/10628-000APA PsycNet psycnet loading doi 10 1037 10628 000
  4. Pengaruh kompetensi dan integritas pada kualitas audit dengan key audit matters sebagai moderasi | AKURASI:... doi.org/10.36407/akurasi.v6i2.1361Pengaruh kompetensi dan integritas pada kualitas audit dengan key audit matters sebagai moderasi AKURASI doi 10 36407 akurasi v6i2 1361
  1. #reputasi kap#reputasi kap
  2. #audit quality#audit quality
Read online
File size273.66 KB
Pages9
Short Linkhttps://juris.id/p-23E
Lookup LinksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar, Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar, CORE.ac.ukCORE.ac.uk, WorldcatWorldcat, ZenodoZenodo, Research GateResearch Gate, Academia.eduAcademia.edu, OpenAlexOpenAlex, Hollis HarvardHollis Harvard
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test