UNDIPUNDIP

Journal of Maritime Studies and National IntegrationJournal of Maritime Studies and National Integration

Stanzas thirteen to fifteen of the Kakawin Negarakertagama mention the regional terms Nusantara and Mitreka Satata. Written by Pu Prapanca, the manuscript clearly elucidates the meanings and distinctions between these terms. Notably, the term Nusantara was already known during the Singhasari era, as evidenced by its appearance in the Camundi inscription under the name Dwipantara. However, there remains considerable ambiguity and frequent misinterpretations regarding these terms, with some even conflating them. This research aims to clarify the meanings of Nusantara and Mitreka Satata and to delineate their differences. Additionally, the study explores the historical contexts and nuances associated with each term. This study employs historical methods with a philological approach, examining inscriptions, statues, and manuscripts categorized as artifacts. The results of this study shed light on the foreign policy of Majapahit as a state. The concept of territorial division was adopted by kingdoms on the island of Java and has been developing since ancient Javanese times. This concept was adhered to even during the Islamic Mataram era and the period of colonialism.

The terms Nusantara and Mitreka Satata are two very different things.It is because the term Nusantara is the term for the territories under the control of the Majapahit kingdom, so in the concept of the country, the term Nusantara is used to refer to the unity of Nagara, Nagara-gung, and Mancanagara.Meanwhile, the term Mitreka Satata refers to foreign kingdoms that were not included in the territory of the Majapahit kingdom (Nusantara).It is because this pupuh does not mention that these kingdoms also sent their envoys to pay respects or make offerings to the king of Majapahit.Mitreka Satata is a term used to describe Majapahits foreign policy of establishing friendly relations with foreign kingdoms.

Based on the findings of this study, further research could delve into the specific strategies employed by the Majapahit kingdom to establish and maintain friendly relations with foreign kingdoms, particularly those in Southeast Asia. Exploring the diplomatic, economic, and cultural exchanges that facilitated these relationships could provide valuable insights into the dynamics of regional power and influence during the 13th century. Additionally, a comparative analysis of the Majapahit kingdoms foreign policy with that of other contemporary kingdoms in the region could offer a broader understanding of the unique aspects of Majapahits approach and its impact on the political landscape of Southeast Asia.

  1. Wacana “Kerajaan Majapahit Bali”: Dinamika Puri Dalam Pusaran Politik Identitas Kontemporer... ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jscl/article/view/19903Wacana AuKerajaan Majapahit BaliAy Dinamika Puri Dalam Pusaran Politik Identitas Kontemporer ejournal undip ac index php jscl article view 19903
Read online
File size941.4 KB
Pages10
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test