STAIBSLLGSTAIBSLLG

Prodising ISIDProdising ISID

In Indonesia, the institution that is tasked with overseeing general elections that are national, permanent and independent in conducting elections is the General Election Commission (KPU). In carrying out its duties, the KPU is assisted by the secretariat general of the provincial KPU and the regency / city KPU respectively assisted by a secretariat. The KPU also has the authority to determine whether a candidate wins or not in a general election. In making a policy, the KPU also has the right to make a General Election Commission Regulation (PKPU) which must be obeyed because PKPU is included in the statutory hierarchy. However, what if the PKPU policy conflicts with the law as in Article 7 paragraph (1) .h PKPU Number 20 of 2018 concerning Nominations for the Peoples Representative Council, Members of Provincial Regional Peoples Representative Council, Regency / City Regional Representative Council explained that the former convict corruption may not be nominated as a member of the legislature, but in reality there are still many former corruption convicts who run for legislative membership. This paper is based on the Law literature and reading materials scattered in various relevant media. The conclusion of the PKPU policy towards ex-convicts who may not run for legislative membership is not in accordance with the legislative regulations concerning elections because it is contrary to the legislative hierarchy.

Kebijakan PKPU terhadap mantan narapidana yang tidak boleh mencalonkan diri menjadi anggota legislatif tidak sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pemilu karena bertentangan dengan Hierarki perundang-undangan.Seharusnya ada kebijakan yang lebih tegas dari pemerintahan.Perlu adanya judicial review serta diajukan ke MA supaya undang-undang yang dibuat tersebut tidak saling bertentangan.

Berdasarkan penelitian ini, terdapat beberapa saran penelitian lanjutan yang dapat dikembangkan. Pertama, penelitian lebih lanjut dapat dilakukan untuk menganalisis dampak sosial dan politik dari kebijakan PKPU terhadap mantan narapidana korupsi, dengan fokus pada persepsi masyarakat dan partisipasi politik mereka. Kedua, penelitian komparatif dapat dilakukan untuk membandingkan kebijakan PKPU dengan regulasi serupa di negara lain, guna mengidentifikasi praktik terbaik dalam membatasi hak politik mantan narapidana korupsi. Ketiga, penelitian kualitatif mendalam dapat dilakukan untuk memahami perspektif para pemangku kepentingan, termasuk KPU, mantan narapidana korupsi, dan masyarakat sipil, mengenai implementasi dan efektivitas kebijakan PKPU, serta mengidentifikasi potensi reformasi kebijakan yang lebih adil dan transparan.

  1. #pola asuh#pola asuh
  2. #ekonomi syariah#ekonomi syariah
Read online
File size239.45 KB
Pages6
Short Linkhttps://juris.id/p-33D
Lookup LinksGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar, Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar, CORE.ac.ukCORE.ac.uk, WorldcatWorldcat, ZenodoZenodo, Research GateResearch Gate, Academia.eduAcademia.edu, OpenAlexOpenAlex, Hollis HarvardHollis Harvard
DMCAReport

Related /

ads-block-test